This is an index of legal resources related to Privacy (especially regards the workplace) as at 6 September 2008.
Electronic Communications – email, entrapment, internet, SMS, tapping
Note: See “Code of Practice on the Protection of Workers’ Personal Data”
Grogan [EL (2004) 20/2 p9] discusses RICA, [Regulation of Interception of Communications & Provision of Communications-related Information Act 70 of 2002] which came into effect on 30 September 2005, and some related issues.
See also ECTA (Electronic Communications & Transactions Act 25 of 2002).
Warren Beech ‘The Right of an Employer to Monitor Employees’ Electronic Usage and other Recordings’ (2005) 26 ILJ pp 650-660 discusses pre-RICA, being the Interception and Monitoring Prohibition Act 127 of 1992, repealed with effect from 30 June 2008.
Constitutional Court
Magajane v Chairperson, NW Gambling Board (GF 6241) [Van der Westhuizen J, 8.06.06]
2006 (10) BCLR 1133 & [2006] JOL 17821(CC)
[Appeal allowed after leave granted – inspection an invasion of privacy – NW Gambling Act 2/2001 s65 invalid as it violated constitutional right to privacy]Omar v Government of RSA (GF 5811) [Van der Westhuizen J, 7.11.05]
2006 (2) BCLR 253 & [2005] JOL 15972 (CC)
[Appeal disallowed – protection orders – validity – Domestic Violence Act 116/1998]Supreme Court of Appeal
Transnet Ltd v SA Metal Machinery Co (Pty) Ltd (GF 5827) [Howie P, 29.11.2005]
(2006) 1 All SA 352; 2006 (4) BCLR 473 & [2005] JOL 16170 (SCA)
[Appeal disallowed – information to be supplied – unsuccessful tenderer]Gumede v Subel NO (Allimpex International Ltd) (GF 5764) [Lewis JA, 27.09.2005]
[2006] 3 All SA 411 & [2005] JOL 15571 (SCA) [Appeal disallowed – commissioner – subpoena – documents – no right to privacy]High Court
Tshabalala-Msimang v Makhanya (GF 6712) [Jajbhay J, 30.08.2007] [2008] 1 All SA 509; 2008 (3) BCLR 338; [2007] JOL 20547 (HC-WLD)
[Medical records ordered to be returned to hospital – respondents to delete all copies of those records but not personal notes – discharged interim order preventing the respondents from further commenting on the records]Omar v Government of RSA (GF 6067) [Tshabalala JP, 31.08.2004] [2005] 3 All SA 65 & [2005] JOL 14471(HC-NPD)
[Application refused – protection order – approved on appeal to CC – see GF 5811 above]Ndlovu v Minister of Correctional Services (GF 6069) [Gautschi AJ, 19.05.2004] [2006] 4 All SA 165 & [2006] JOL 17037 (HC-WLD)
[Damages awarded for wrongful detention – computer printouts – evidential value – ECT Act 25/2002 interpreted]
Protea Technology Ltd v Wainer (GF 5261) [Heher J, 29.09.1997]
1997 (9) BCLR 1225 (W)
[Telephone tapping]
Labour Court
Jafta v Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife (GF 7139) [Pillay J, 1.07.2008] [2008] JOL 22096 (LC)
[Upheld claim for contractual damages resulting from repudiation of contract by employer – offer of employment accepted by SMS – ECTA 25/2002 interpreted and applied – proof of loss – awarded damages of R166,336.07 for loss of past and future earnings and travelling expenses]Van Wyk v Independent Newspapers Gauteng (Pty) Ltd (GF 5800) [Revelas J, 11.03.05] [2006] 1 BLLR 73; (2005) 26 ILJ 2433 & [2005] JOL 15777 (LC)
[Fair & lawful reason to dismiss – email abuse – no right to privacy]Grieve v Denel (Pty) Ltd (GF 5103) [Pillemer AJ, 30.01.2003] [2003] 4 BLLR 366 & (2003) 24 ILJ 551 (LC)
[email abuse]
Cronje v Toyota Manufacturing (GF 4948) [Gering AJ, 18.07.2002] [2002] 9 BLLR 855 & (2002) 23 ILJ 1563 (LC)
[email abuse]
Cape Town City Council v SAMWU (GF 4387) [Stelzner AJ, 22.09.2000] [2000] 11 BLLR 1239 & (2000) 21 ILJ 2409 (LC)
[Unfair dismissals – reinstated – entrapment permissible but must be fair and comply with Criminal Procedure Act]
Arbitration Awards
Toker Bros (Pty) Ltd /Keyser (GFA 2380) [Van Niekerk, 17.06.2005]
(2005) 26 ILJ 1366 (CCMA)
[Fair & lawful reason to dismiss – abuse of email – defamation – no right to privacy]Caji / Africa Personnel Services (Pty) Ltd (GFA 2274) [Van Rooyen, 27.10.2004]
(2005) 26 ILJ 150 (CCMA)
[Entrapment – guidelines – CPA 51/1977 – s 252A – application]Mbuli / Spartan Wiremakers CC (GFA 2062) [Loveday [G], 25.03.2004] [2004] 5 BALR 598 & (2004) 25 ILJ 1128 (MEIBC)
[entrapment – dismissal fair]NUMSA obo Abrahams / Guestro Wheels (GFA 2045) [Brand [F], 16.02.2004] [2004] 4 BALR 520 (CCMA)
[videotape]Smuts v Backup Storage Facilities (GFA 1375) [Taylor [N], 11.11.2002] [2003] 2 BALR 219 (CCMA)
[Illicit internet use]
Dauth / Weir’s Cash & Carry (GFA 493) [Lyster, 22.05.2002]
(2002) 23 ILJ 1472 (CCMA)
[email abuse]
Sugreen / Standard Bank of SA Ltd (GFA 892) [Rycroft, 29.04.2002] [2002] 7 BALR 769 & (2002) 23 ILJ 1319 (CCMA)
[Telephone tapping]
Jardine / Tongaat Hulett Sugar Ltd (GFA 842) [Rycroft, 23.01.2002] [2002] 4 BALR 426 & (2002) 23 ILJ 547 (CCMA)
[email abuse]
Philander / CSC Computer Sciences (GFA 835) [Maritz, 27.12.2001] [2002] 3 BALR 304 (CCMA)
[email abuse]
Bamford / Energizer (SA) Ltd (GFA 792) [Sutherland, 2.10.2001] [2001] 12 BALR 1251 (P)
[Illicit internet use]
Volkwyn / Truworths Ltd (GFA 868) [Kruger, 11.02.2001] [2001] 12 BALR 1251 (P)
[SMS abuse]
Cronje / Toyota Manufacturing (GFA 402) [Lyster, 9.11.2000] [2001] 3 BALR 213 (CCMA)
[email abuse – see LC case GF 4948]Moonsamy / The Mailhouse (GFA 1349) [Van Dokkum, 13.07.1998]
(1999) 20 ILJ 464 (CCMA)
[Telephone tapping]
Mncube v Cash Paymaster Services (Pty) Ltd (GFA 1124) [Pillay, 6.05.1997] [1997] 5 BLLR 639 (CCMA)
[Fair dismissal – polygraph tests not acceptable as corroborative evidence]