Print Print

Corporate Governance: Index (Part 1)

October 22, 2008 – 10:25 am by Graham Giles

This is an index of some legal resources related to the broad concept of corporate governance, which includes fairness, accountability, responsibility, transparency, and risk management:

2005 ONWARDS

[Constitutional Court]

Sidumo v Rustenburg Platinum Mines Ltd (GF 6778) [Navsa AJ et al, 5.10.2007]

[2007] 12 BLLR 1097; 2008 (2) BCLR 158; (2007) 28 ILJ 2405; [2007] JOL 20811 (CC)

[Appeal allowed - CCMA award of reinstatement restored after nearly 7 years - CCMA must decide whether employer's decision to terminate is for a fair reason related to conduct - so-called "reasonable employer test" rejected - only set aside award if no reasonable arbitrator couldĀ  have made it - see SCA below - GF 6306]

Masetlha v President of RSA (GF 6777) [Moseneke DCJ et al, 3.10.2007]

[2008] 1 BCLR 1; 2008 (1) SA 566 & [2007] JOL 20763 (CC)

[Appeal allowed - irretrievable breakdown in employment relationship - lawful & fair to terminate fixed-term contract - employee cannot be deprived of full benefits of remaining 21 months of the contract - see HC below - GF 6454]

Fuel Retailers Association of SA v Dept of Agriculture (GF 6619) [Ngcobo J, 7.06.2007]

2007 (10) BCLR 1059 & 2007 (6) SA 4 (CC)

[Appeal allowed - decision authorising construction of filling station reviewed and set aside - National Environmental Management Act 107 of 1998 ("NEMA") & Environment Conservation Act 73 of 1989 ("ECA") secs 21 & 22(1) interpreted & applied]

[Supreme Court of Appeal - 2006 onwards]

Da Silva v CH Chemicals (Pty) Ltd (GF 7231) [Scott JA, 23.09.2008]

[2008] ZASCA 110 - unreported case SCA 304/07 (SCA)

[Appeal partly allowed - director's fiduciary duties - good faith - resignation does not affect most duties - unlawful competition also an issue ]

Allaclas Investments (Pty) Ltd v Milnerton GC (GF 6862) [Farlam JA, 29.11.2007]

[2007] ZASCA 167; [2008] 2 All SA 1; 2008 (3) SA 134; [2008] JOL 21167 (SCA)

[Appeal allowed - order set aside - see GF 6297 (HC) - failure to prevent nuisance from golf balls landing in private properties - interdict granted to prevent use of part of golf course]

Rustenburg Platinum Mines Ltd v CCMA (GF 6306) [Cameron JA, 26.09.2006]

[2006] ZASCA 115; [2006] 11 BLLR 1021; [2007] 1 All SA 164; 2007 (1) SA 576; (2006) 27 ILJ 2076 & [2006] JOL 18359 (SCA)

[Appeal allowed - employer primarily responsible to set and enforce standards - conduct that destroys trust entitles employer to terminate employment provided it is within range of reasonable responses, even if employer has not transgressed for 14 years - review powers not to be confused with appeals - appeal allowed - see GF 6778 (CC)]

The rest of this article is only available to a registered user with one of the following subscriptions: Trial, Client, Student, Subscriber. To continue reading this article, please either:
  • Subscribe - unlimited access for R495 per month per subscriber. It's quick and easy, and you can unsubscribe at any time. Find out more about the benefits of subscribing. Why you should pay for the content. Subscribe Now.
  • Register - limited access for FREE, and without obligation. It's quick and easy to get greater access instantly. Select "Free Account" under the Subscription Options. [ Register ]
Already a subscriber or registered? Login on the right or [ Login ]

Similar:

  • Share/Bookmark

Tags:

You must be logged in to post a comment.